What Would Justice Blackmun Say? A Response to Dobbs, 51 J.L. Med. & Ethics 468 (2023).
Link
Egg-Freezing, Uterine Transplants, and In Vitro Gametogenesis: Disruptive or Normalizing Reproductive Technologies?, 22 Hous. J. Health L. & Pol’y 123 (2022).
Link
Informed Consent, Body Property, and Self-Sovereignty, 44 J.L. Med. & Ethics 437 (2016).
Link
Selective Reduction: “A Soft Cover for Hard Choices”, 43 J.L. Med. & Ethics 196 (2015).
Hierarchies of Discrimination in Baby Making? A Response to Professor Carroll, 88 Ind. L.J. 1217 (2013).
Link
How (Not) to Regulate ARTs: Lessons from Octomom, 21 Alb. L.J. Sci. & Tech. 313 (2011).
Link
Equal Liberty: Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Equality, 76 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1457 (2008).
Link
Genes and Spleens: Property, Contract, or Privacy Rights in the Human Body?, 35 J.L. Med. & Ethics 371 (2007).
Link
Legal Limitations on Genetic Research and the Commercialization of Its Results, 54 Am. J. Comp. L. 45 (2006) (with Michael Malinowski).
Link
A Veil of Genetic Ignorance? Protecting Genetic Privacy to Ensure Equality, 51 Vill. L. Rev. 827 (2006).
Link
Coercion.Commercialization.and Commodification: The Ethics of Compensation for Egg Donors in Stem Cell Research, 21 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1055 (2006).
Link
What’s So Strange About Human Cloning?, 53 Hastings L.J. 1007 (2002).
Link
Property, Privacy, and the Human Body, 80 B.U. L. Rev. 359 (2000).
Link
Reconceiving Privacy: Relationships and Reproductive Technology, 45 UCLA L. Rev. 1077 (1998).
Link
The Author of Roe, 26 Hastings Const. L.Q. 21 (1998).
Link
Proprieta e Techologie Riproduttive, 15 RCDP 1 (1997).
Assisted Reproductive Technology and the Threat to the Traditional Family, 47 Hastings L.J. 951 (1996) (reprinted in A Health Law Reader: An Interdisciplinary Approach 91 (John H. Robinson, Roberta M. Berry, & Kevin McDonnell eds., Carolina Academic Press 1999)).
Link
Chapters in Books
Abortion, in Max Planck Encyclopedia of Comparative Constitutional Law 0 (Rainer Grote, Frauke Lachenmann, and Rudiger Wolfrum eds., Oxford Univ. Press 2017).
Property, Privacy, and Other Legal Constructions of Human Embryos, in The ‘Healthy’ Embryo: Social, Biomedical, Legal and Philosophical Perspectives 32 (Jeff Nisker, Françoise Baylis, Isabel Karpin, Carolyn McLeod & Roxanne Mykitiuk, Cambridge Univ.Press 2009).
Abortion Rights, in Global Perspectives on Constitutional Law 73 (Vikram David Amar & Mark V.Tushnet eds., Oxford Univ.Press 2009).
Surrogacy Law in the United States: The Outcome of Ambivalence, in Surrogate Motherhood: International Perspectives 23 (Rachel Cook & Shelley Day Sclater eds., Hart 2003).
Book Reviews
Book Review, Law & Soc’y Rev. (2020) (reviewing MARY ZIEGLER, BEYOND ABORTION: ROE V. WADE AND THE BATTLE FOR PRIVACY (2018)).
Constitutional Misconceptions, 93 Mich. L. Rev. 1473 (1995) (reviewing JOHN ROBERTSON: CHILDREN OF CHOICE).
The Priest Who Kept His Faith But Lost His Job, 103 Harv. L. Rev. 2074 (1990) (reviewing ROBERT H.BORK, THE TEMPTING OF AMERICA (1990)).
Newspaper & Magazine Articles
Outlawing Certain Methods Puts Right to Choose at Risk, 6 L.A. Daily J., Aug. 29, 2000.
Student Note/Comment
Comment: Equal Protection & Leading Cases; Supreme Court 1988 Term, 103 Harv. L. Rev. 217 (1989).